Cheongju Women's Prison 5-person photoshoot...Secondary victimization controversy...jpg
μλ³Έ (Korean)
Translation + Context
FT = ForbiddenTome β tap to see Korean slang explained
Yonhapnews
Yonhapnews Cheongju Women's Prison "5-Person Gang" Photo Series? ... 'A Criminal Meme' Secondary Victimization Controversy Reporter Cho Hyun-young Edited 2026.05.02. 8:10 AM ~ Article Summary) The public is trivializing brutal criminals and consuming crime as entertainment... Views reaching millions Police: "No clear punishment regulations".. Experts: "Legal legislation discussion urgent"
AI-generated images spreading under the name 'Cheongju Women's Prison 5-Person Gang' [Online community screenshot. Resale and DB prohibited] The photos show in order from 1-5: Jung Yoo-jung who killed and abandoned Lee Eun-hae and a peer woman she met through a tutoring app, Ko Yu-jung who stabbed her ex-husband with a weapon, murdered him, and abandoned his corpse, Kim So-young who killed two men with drugged beverages, and Eom In-sook from the 'Eom Yeoin Incident' who killed her husband and lover with drugs then disguised it as an accident to claim insurance money, staring straight ahead. Wanna go to the valley?
Wanna grab some curry?
Wanna have a drink? Examples of 'memes' made using publicly identified female violent criminals [Online community screenshot. Resale and DB prohibited] The problem is that while the public consumes this as interesting content, actual crime victims are exposed to serious 'secondary victimization'. Follow South Korea human rights is for protecting perpetrators and criminals. Reply 6
Β
Β
Β
Good people are busy following the law
Bad people are busy keeping the law busy
Just Stop It, For God's Sake
78172 months agoby merryfrog339976
College Guy Found a Smart Girlfriend
147122 months agoby peppyquail958355
Jensen Huang Shocked to Learn Someone Still Uses an RTX 2070
138142 months agoby livelyfrog614806
Why Gym Rat Seniors Got Dragged to Disciplinary Hearing
139282 months agoby peppypanda520052
Why Korean men have fantasies about Japanese women
95232 months agoby happynewt526963
The Oldest Voter in This Election Was 197 Years Old
12372 months agoby peppyquail932037
Influencer Kang In-kyung Shows Support for Jamsil Protests
50282 months agoby fluffygecko165818
50-Year-Old Man's YouTube Shorts Comment Level lol
84232 months agoby jollypuppy723406
4-Million-Subscriber YouTuber Couple Decides to Abort Fetus Diagnosed with Down Syndrome
144142 months agoby sunnywolf124774
A Meme You Can't Use Anymore π
65112 months agoby happymole588763
The Most Shocking Part of the Jamsil Election Group Chat
105212 months agoby cozylynx533304
July 7th Censorship Law Expansion Amendment
53272 months agoby jollywolf838585
The Election Commission Pulls Off Another all-time major blunder
91152 months agoby merryhawk397937
The National Election Commission turned out to be absolutely wild lol
10192 months agoby perkygecko560374
Internet Censorship Template
82192 months agoby peppyhawk963188
Tonight's MBC News Desk Closing Remarks
14762 months agoby cozycat392353
Domestic Community Censorship Drama Explained.jpg
61102 months agoby snappyduck855211
Press This Button to Get $100 in Your Account. But...
122172 months agoby gleefulseal657643
Proof that Lisène showed up.jpg
10692 months agoby sparklydeer838402
AI Censorship Fact-Check Going into Effect July 1st
89222 months agoby peppyquail932037
6 comments
Look at these damn paparazzi using such clever wording? They're ridiculing criminals but calling it "making heinous criminals a joke," "consuming crimes as entertainment" and writing articles about it. And then they say mocking these assholes is secondary victimization of victims? Who's defending them? Do people just write articles based on whatever nonsense they ramble about on Twitter these days? Or has it been like this for a while now?
Holy shit lmaooooo
This is why we can't have nice things... women prisoners do a photoshoot and suddenly it's problematic? Make it make sense
Talking like this makes you look like you're not swept up by emotions and you're an enlightened person, right? Hehehehe
Reading the article, turns out they're talking about regulations and legislation lol...I get that they might delete mocking posts if victims or families request it, but talking about punishment provisions too? It seems like they're discussing using state power to crack down on all of this. In the end, it's just an extension of censorship and regulation violating freedom. How are we supposed to accept this? If the government gets involved in everything that's morally controversial, the right to think independently and act freely disappears. Blindly accepting it is just stupid
Fancy way of saying just let people mess around with memes, right? The thing is, on platforms like YouTube these past 2 days, there's AI footage of notorious criminals like serial killers Yoo Young-chul and Kang Ho-soon, as well as O Won-chun and Jung Yoo-jeong, in prison clothes eating or walking around the prison being spread indiscriminately with titles like "Prison Update" and "Prison Food." Right now this whole situation is just being used to farm YouTube views
ok but the secondary victimization part is actually serious, we should probably read more before commenting lol
South Korea really out here finding new ways to debate everything I swear π
Even if you drink soda and eat curry and go freediving at a valley, you'll still be alive lol
nah this is giving performative activism, like let them have ONE thing without making it about victimization
Wait, a prison photoshoot? That's actually wild, I'm confused what the controversy is about though π