Cheongju Women's Prison 5-person photoshoot...Secondary victimization controversy...jpg
์๋ณธ (Korean)
Translation + Context
FT = ForbiddenTome โ tap to see Korean slang explained

Yonhapnews
Yonhapnews Cheongju Women's Prison "5-Person Gang" Photo Series? ... 'A Criminal Meme' Secondary Victimization Controversy Reporter Cho Hyun-young Edited 2026.05.02. 8:10 AM ~ Article Summary) The public is trivializing brutal criminals and consuming crime as entertainment... Views reaching millions Police: "No clear punishment regulations".. Experts: "Legal legislation discussion urgent"
AI-generated images spreading under the name 'Cheongju Women's Prison 5-Person Gang' [Online community screenshot. Resale and DB prohibited] The photos show in order from 1-5: Jung Yoo-jung who killed and abandoned Lee Eun-hae and a peer woman she met through a tutoring app, Ko Yu-jung who stabbed her ex-husband with a weapon, murdered him, and abandoned his corpse, Kim So-young who killed two men with drugged beverages, and Eom In-sook from the 'Eom Yeoin Incident' who killed her husband and lover with drugs then disguised it as an accident to claim insurance money, staring straight ahead. Wanna go to the valley?
Wanna grab some curry?
Wanna have a drink? Examples of 'memes' made using publicly identified female violent criminals [Online community screenshot. Resale and DB prohibited] The problem is that while the public consumes this as interesting content, actual crime victims are exposed to serious 'secondary victimization'. Follow South Korea human rights is for protecting perpetrators and criminals. Reply 6
ย
ย
ย
Good people are busy following the law
Bad people are busy keeping the law busy

The Day EBS Instructors Are Most Nervous
123212 months agoby brightcrow614844
Johnny Somali Apologizes: "I Made a Mistake, Please Save Me, I'm Truly Sorry"
123122 months agoby bubblypanda107636
High School Status Check in 2026
77212 months agoby cozypuppy304417
A Pretty Wild Law Going Into Effect in About a Month
120222 months agoby sunnyquail768396
A lifetime free showdown split 50-50: Taxi vs. First Class Flights
54202 months agoby radiantcrane456725
Our Neighborhood's Unusual Mister
52222 months agoby fluffybunny846855
Election Commission Mistakenly Entered Vote Count Data
62182 months agoby breezyquail556885
Surprisingly, Seoul National University will admit you just for submitting an application
107202 months agoby luckypuppy897717
Thinly Sliced Pork: The Snack Younger Koreans Are Rejecting.jpg
59252 months agoby breezygecko146294
Police report scooter delivery driver, tell them exactly this
11882 months agoby breezypanda353020
Why Do Korean People Have Such a Good Sense of Humor Lmaoooo
7472 months agoby sparklypuppy958839
Femco getting called out in today's news. Jpg
139162 months agoby zippycrane555912
Judge: What is the name of Mr. Shin Tae-il's agency?
143232 months agoby brightsloth413884
Lord of the Rings: The One Ring's Ownership Duration by Owner
148152 months agoby merryhawk397937
Stellar Blade 2 Female Lead's Appearance: Reddit Reactions
138132 months agoby goldenpanda590494
Actress Moon Geun-young's Current Status After Being Called "Nation's Little Sister"
105322 months agoby bouncymole802682
Israel Accused of "Crossing a Line" as International Community Horrified
12282 months agoby sparklyseal219503
32-year-old with leukemia and vocal cord paralysis update: went to Jeju solo anyway
11392 months agoby radiantcrane456725
Why an Army Base's Electric Bill Was So High
83432 months agoby bubblypanda107636
If a Law's Name Doesn't Sound Official, It's a Stupid Law
113202 months agoby happyduck648513
6 comments
Look at these damn paparazzi using such clever wording? They're ridiculing criminals but calling it "making heinous criminals a joke," "consuming crimes as entertainment" and writing articles about it. And then they say mocking these assholes is secondary victimization of victims? Who's defending them? Do people just write articles based on whatever nonsense they ramble about on Twitter these days? Or has it been like this for a while now?
Holy shit lmaooooo
This is why we can't have nice things... women prisoners do a photoshoot and suddenly it's problematic? Make it make sense
Talking like this makes you look like you're not swept up by emotions and you're an enlightened person, right? Hehehehe
Reading the article, turns out they're talking about regulations and legislation lol...I get that they might delete mocking posts if victims or families request it, but talking about punishment provisions too? It seems like they're discussing using state power to crack down on all of this. In the end, it's just an extension of censorship and regulation violating freedom. How are we supposed to accept this? If the government gets involved in everything that's morally controversial, the right to think independently and act freely disappears. Blindly accepting it is just stupid
Fancy way of saying just let people mess around with memes, right? The thing is, on platforms like YouTube these past 2 days, there's AI footage of notorious criminals like serial killers Yoo Young-chul and Kang Ho-soon, as well as O Won-chun and Jung Yoo-jeong, in prison clothes eating or walking around the prison being spread indiscriminately with titles like "Prison Update" and "Prison Food." Right now this whole situation is just being used to farm YouTube views
ok but the secondary victimization part is actually serious, we should probably read more before commenting lol
South Korea really out here finding new ways to debate everything I swear ๐
Even if you drink soda and eat curry and go freediving at a valley, you'll still be alive lol
nah this is giving performative activism, like let them have ONE thing without making it about victimization
Wait, a prison photoshoot? That's actually wild, I'm confused what the controversy is about though ๐