Cheongju Women's Prison 5-person photoshoot...Secondary victimization controversy...jpg
원본 (Korean)
Translation + Context
FT = ForbiddenTome — tap to see Korean slang explained
Yonhapnews
Yonhapnews Cheongju Women's Prison "5-Person Gang" Photo Series? ... 'A Criminal Meme' Secondary Victimization Controversy Reporter Cho Hyun-young Edited 2026.05.02. 8:10 AM ~ Article Summary) The public is trivializing brutal criminals and consuming crime as entertainment... Views reaching millions Police: "No clear punishment regulations".. Experts: "Legal legislation discussion urgent"
AI-generated images spreading under the name 'Cheongju Women's Prison 5-Person Gang' [Online community screenshot. Resale and DB prohibited] The photos show in order from 1-5: Jung Yoo-jung who killed and abandoned Lee Eun-hae and a peer woman she met through a tutoring app, Ko Yu-jung who stabbed her ex-husband with a weapon, murdered him, and abandoned his corpse, Kim So-young who killed two men with drugged beverages, and Eom In-sook from the 'Eom Yeoin Incident' who killed her husband and lover with drugs then disguised it as an accident to claim insurance money, staring straight ahead. Wanna go to the valley?
Wanna grab some curry?
Wanna have a drink? Examples of 'memes' made using publicly identified female violent criminals [Online community screenshot. Resale and DB prohibited] The problem is that while the public consumes this as interesting content, actual crime victims are exposed to serious 'secondary victimization'. Follow South Korea human rights is for protecting perpetrators and criminals. Reply 6
Good people are busy following the law
Bad people are busy keeping the law busy
50% of Adult Men Have Experience with Affairs
821319 days agoby bubblyseal228771
Man in His 40s Arrested After Hitting Female Health Center Employee Over Elevator Button Mix-up
1161020 days agoby merryotter495433
YouTuber 'Rooster' Kidnapping Murder Attempt... Court Sentences 30 Years Prison
942820 days agoby brightcrow614844
Thought it was worth 6 million won—turned out to be a priceless heirloom
1303120 days agoby sparklycat992291
Pemko Operator's Angry Statement on Community Crackdown
1032320 days agoby boppycat626550
???: Call of Duty Finally Uses Korea as a Setting
682820 days agoby brightmole349670
Most Annoying Type During Summer
671520 days agoby zippycat918419
Wegovy, Mounjaro Regulation Makes No Sense Lol
601621 days agoby funkyseal327491
Absolute Legend Stone Age Mindsetㅋㅋㅋㅋㅋㅋ
1221121 days agoby brightowl508639
The Only Cure for Schizophrenia That Humanity Knows About
1012121 days agoby bubblyseal228771
Lisenne's wedding venue storyㅋㅋㅋ
501121 days agoby snappycrane509511
Corporate Instagram Admins These Days
1501421 days agoby jollywolf838585
A Female Streamer Falsely Accused of Sexual Assault
1052522 days agoby goldenpanda590494
What a Top High School Hagwon Instructor Thinks About Gender Equality
1111622 days agoby brightquail948846
I Finally Became a Twin Dad aaaaaah
1501222 days agoby perkyfox693854
BREAKING: Army's First Official Statement on Reserve Soldier Death — "Unrelated to Heat Wave"
701222 days agoby sweetcrane791459
Actor Kim Soo-hyun the commerce god Eun-hyun receiving flowers from female fans lol
1242323 days agoby livelynewt921090
Ministry of Land: So Seoul, you're saying we can use half the rebar from now on? ^^
874523 days agoby cozyfox801555
Why Dogs Wear Spiked Collars
1281823 days agoby bubblypanda107636
Forget Starbucks, the Food Trend That's Blowing Up Right Now for real
1011523 days agoby luckysloth848174
6 comments
Look at these damn paparazzi using such clever wording? They're ridiculing criminals but calling it "making heinous criminals a joke," "consuming crimes as entertainment" and writing articles about it. And then they say mocking these assholes is secondary victimization of victims? Who's defending them? Do people just write articles based on whatever nonsense they ramble about on Twitter these days? Or has it been like this for a while now?
Holy shit lmaooooo
This is why we can't have nice things... women prisoners do a photoshoot and suddenly it's problematic? Make it make sense
Talking like this makes you look like you're not swept up by emotions and you're an enlightened person, right? Hehehehe
Reading the article, turns out they're talking about regulations and legislation lol...I get that they might delete mocking posts if victims or families request it, but talking about punishment provisions too? It seems like they're discussing using state power to crack down on all of this. In the end, it's just an extension of censorship and regulation violating freedom. How are we supposed to accept this? If the government gets involved in everything that's morally controversial, the right to think independently and act freely disappears. Blindly accepting it is just stupid
Fancy way of saying just let people mess around with memes, right? The thing is, on platforms like YouTube these past 2 days, there's AI footage of notorious criminals like serial killers Yoo Young-chul and Kang Ho-soon, as well as O Won-chun and Jung Yoo-jeong, in prison clothes eating or walking around the prison being spread indiscriminately with titles like "Prison Update" and "Prison Food." Right now this whole situation is just being used to farm YouTube views
ok but the secondary victimization part is actually serious, we should probably read more before commenting lol
South Korea really out here finding new ways to debate everything I swear 💀
Even if you drink soda and eat curry and go freediving at a valley, you'll still be alive lol
nah this is giving performative activism, like let them have ONE thing without making it about victimization
Wait, a prison photoshoot? That's actually wild, I'm confused what the controversy is about though 😅