Cheongju Women's Prison 5-person photoshoot...Secondary victimization controversy...jpg
μλ³Έ (Korean)
Translation + Context
FT = ForbiddenTome β tap to see Korean slang explained
Yonhapnews
Yonhapnews Cheongju Women's Prison "5-Person Gang" Photo Series? ... 'A Criminal Meme' Secondary Victimization Controversy Reporter Cho Hyun-young Edited 2026.05.02. 8:10 AM ~ Article Summary) The public is trivializing brutal criminals and consuming crime as entertainment... Views reaching millions Police: "No clear punishment regulations".. Experts: "Legal legislation discussion urgent"
AI-generated images spreading under the name 'Cheongju Women's Prison 5-Person Gang' [Online community screenshot. Resale and DB prohibited] The photos show in order from 1-5: Jung Yoo-jung who killed and abandoned Lee Eun-hae and a peer woman she met through a tutoring app, Ko Yu-jung who stabbed her ex-husband with a weapon, murdered him, and abandoned his corpse, Kim So-young who killed two men with drugged beverages, and Eom In-sook from the 'Eom Yeoin Incident' who killed her husband and lover with drugs then disguised it as an accident to claim insurance money, staring straight ahead. Wanna go to the valley?
Wanna grab some curry?
Wanna have a drink? Examples of 'memes' made using publicly identified female violent criminals [Online community screenshot. Resale and DB prohibited] The problem is that while the public consumes this as interesting content, actual crime victims are exposed to serious 'secondary victimization'. Follow South Korea human rights is for protecting perpetrators and criminals. Reply 6
Β
Β
Β
Good people are busy following the law
Bad people are busy keeping the law busy
The National Election Commission turned out to be absolutely wild lol
101913 days agoby perkygecko560374
Internet Censorship Template
821913 days agoby peppyhawk963188
Tonight's MBC News Desk Closing Remarks
147613 days agoby cozycat392353
Domestic Community Censorship Drama Explained.jpg
611013 days agoby snappyduck855211
Press This Button to Get $100 in Your Account. But...
1221713 days agoby gleefulseal657643
Proof that Lisène showed up.jpg
106913 days agoby sparklydeer838402
AI Censorship Fact-Check Going into Effect July 1st
892214 days agoby peppyquail932037
The Most Unlucky People at Jamsil 7-dong Polling Station #2 Right Now
1501214 days agoby fluffymole250266
Why There Weren't Enough Ballots This Election
942014 days agoby happykoala132851
You shouldn't have misconceptions about science...
533314 days agoby sunnykoala261685
Do you know that North Korea is our main enemy?
761514 days agoby sparklycat992291
The Japanese Cabinet Minister Causing a Stir Among International Otaku
1422014 days agoby sunnylynx870905
S-Tier Ability Humans Have.JPG
1361215 days agoby brightbunny293015
Why the Defense Ministry Is Completely Responsible for the Conscript's Death (Descendants of the Sun Season 2)
1141815 days agoby breezyquail332258
God of Commerce Furious at Lawmaker Insisting He Delete Gaeseyeon Channel
1052515 days agoby cozyquail608557
The National Card That Only Exists in 300 Copies.jpg
1023015 days agoby jollyllama813168
Cyber troll "Ppukga" current situation.jpg
561015 days agoby fluffysloth381608
Why School Violence Punishments Are So Problematic Right Now.jpg
1282316 days agoby gleefulnewt671882
This DC user having fun and vibing with AI...jpg
972116 days agoby livelynewt921090
Starbucks Boycott Movement's Final Goal.jpg
63616 days agoby sunnywolf124774
6 comments
Look at these damn paparazzi using such clever wording? They're ridiculing criminals but calling it "making heinous criminals a joke," "consuming crimes as entertainment" and writing articles about it. And then they say mocking these assholes is secondary victimization of victims? Who's defending them? Do people just write articles based on whatever nonsense they ramble about on Twitter these days? Or has it been like this for a while now?
Holy shit lmaooooo
This is why we can't have nice things... women prisoners do a photoshoot and suddenly it's problematic? Make it make sense
Talking like this makes you look like you're not swept up by emotions and you're an enlightened person, right? Hehehehe
Reading the article, turns out they're talking about regulations and legislation lol...I get that they might delete mocking posts if victims or families request it, but talking about punishment provisions too? It seems like they're discussing using state power to crack down on all of this. In the end, it's just an extension of censorship and regulation violating freedom. How are we supposed to accept this? If the government gets involved in everything that's morally controversial, the right to think independently and act freely disappears. Blindly accepting it is just stupid
Fancy way of saying just let people mess around with memes, right? The thing is, on platforms like YouTube these past 2 days, there's AI footage of notorious criminals like serial killers Yoo Young-chul and Kang Ho-soon, as well as O Won-chun and Jung Yoo-jeong, in prison clothes eating or walking around the prison being spread indiscriminately with titles like "Prison Update" and "Prison Food." Right now this whole situation is just being used to farm YouTube views
ok but the secondary victimization part is actually serious, we should probably read more before commenting lol
South Korea really out here finding new ways to debate everything I swear π
Even if you drink soda and eat curry and go freediving at a valley, you'll still be alive lol
nah this is giving performative activism, like let them have ONE thing without making it about victimization
Wait, a prison photoshoot? That's actually wild, I'm confused what the controversy is about though π