Ministry of Land: So Seoul, you're saying we can use half the rebar from now on? ^^
원본 (Korean)
Translation + Context
FT = ForbiddenTome — tap to see Korean slang explained

Charm of the East Sea
Seoul Special City
Special City Seoul
Seoul City "Safe even without reinforcement"... "Only half going forward?"

"Safe even with half the rebar?"
Donghae · Attractive Special City Seoul
Seoul Special City
Youngdong-daero Complex Development Basement 5F Pillar Site
Star of Seoul
Seoul Special City
Seoul Special City
Acting Seoul Mayor "Safe even with rebar missing"

"Half the rebar—is it 'safe'?"
Kim Sung-bo / Acting Seoul Mayor I was referring to Seoul City's judgment that, according to the design method recognized by the state, it appears to be safe.

MBC News Desk
Half the rebar—'Safe?'
Pillar strength (KN)
Strength reduction coefficient applied
Material coefficient applied
Required strength
59,349 Met
Not met
[Seoul City]

Special City Seoul
MBC News Desk
"Is it safe with only half the reinforcing steel?"
Dongdae-ro Underground Space Complex Development Section 3 Construction - 5-Story Column Load/Strength Comparison Table
Condition After Reinforcement
Current Condition
• Seoul
Column Strength (KN)
Column Strength (KN)
"Strength
Single Row Rebar Placement
(Load) 1)
Single Row Rebar + Steel Plate
20 Rebar Placement
Strength Reduction Factor Review Material Factor Review
Recently 1 Day Omission Reflected
Material Factor Applied
Strength Design '(Strength Reduction Factor' KDS 14
Design Method
Strength Design Method (Material Factor Applied) ₩ 2020 Appendix
Kim Sung-bo / Acting Seoul Mayor
Even though the rebar was omitted, according to the design method approved by the government, when originally placing 2 rows of rebar, equivalent strength is achieved.

"Half the rebar and it's still 'safe?'"
"Slab cracks unrelated to missing column rebar"

MBC News Desk
"Safety?" Even with half the rebar
East Sea · Charm
"Seoul Metropolitan City
Metropolitan City Seoul
Power
Charm
Seoul
Kim Sung-bo / Acting Seoul Mayor "Structurally there are no safety issues" - so that's how you write the article, right? Because the part where rebar was omitted is clear.

MBC News Desk
'Safe with half the rebar?'
East Sea charm
'Seoul Special City
Special City Seoul
"Charm
Sea · Charm
Seoul
Kim Sung-bo / Seoul Mayor Acting Authority There are anxious psychological aspects, and in terms of completing what was originally designed, I think it's appropriate to implement reinforcement.

National Railroad Corporation Emergency Safety Inspection Results
Structural stability ㅇ Multiple cracks confirmed in the basement level 5 slab, but mainly assessed to have high possibility of non-structural cracks such as mesh cracks due to drying shrinkage. However, some sections show continued water leakage even after crack repairs, raising concerns about long-term structural durability deterioration, so continuous monitoring and repair/reinforcement of cracks and water leakage is necessary. ㅇ Test train passage vibration level 0.04-0.07kime, due to construction errors the design strength of the columns was not secured, even after opening around 60krrrrr adjacent construction, the structure requires urgent column reinforcement ㅇ Currently the structure is in the construction stage where full superimposed loads are not all applied (B3 layer under construction), but due to construction errors the design strength of the columns was not secured, so urgent column reinforcement is deemed necessary. Furthermore, structural review considering current conditions and load conditions by construction process stage, etc. is necessary to secure structural stability □ Column Reinforcement Plan ㅇ Reinforcement for axial force deficiency due to column rebar omission can consider section expansion method or steel plate reinforcement method, and Seoul City (Constructor Hyundai E&C) is proceeding with reinforcement direction as steel plate reinforcement + epoxy filling + fireproof paint through consultation, etc.

MBC News Desk
"Safety with half the rebar?"
Ministry of Land, Infrastructure and Transport Official: "Seoul shows a lack of safety awareness. Going forward, does that mean we only need to use half the rebar in all designs?"

What are you talking about? You're spouting nonsense x seriously so annoying

Seunghee, close the door quick
1071711 days agoby brightquail948846
MBC's Past 5.18 Mocking Controversy
731611 days agoby perkycrane527104
The "nono" trend is back again!
1011811 days agoby livelycrow599371
21-Character Legend Comment That Silenced Everyone After This Reserve Military Death
94712 days agoby merrylynx524708
How Kindness Can Destroy Someone: Reader Feedback That Hits Different
1302112 days agoby funkywren267571
An Otaku's Honest Review After Finally Showering Because Their Partner Kept Saying They Stink
1241012 days agoby merryotter495433
Famous Art Museum Poisoned Someone Else's Ginkgo Tree
94412 days agoby breezygecko146294
One Mukbang YouTuber's Major Crisis.gif
96512 days agoby jollybunny169807
The Current State of Our Country's SNS Right Now
721312 days agoby luckykoala631850
Kim Sun-tae Donates 100 Million Won to Chungju Medical Center.jpg
702113 days agoby playfulpuppy230038- —
If Political Drama Gets You This Riled Up
622013 days agoby happynewt526963 
81 Foreigners Had Ozempic and Wegovy Confiscated at Incheon Airport in Q1 LMAOOO
1471313 days agoby jollyllama813168
Noise Worse Than a School Sports Day, But Complaints Go Nowhere.jpg
801313 days agoby perkygecko560374
Starbucks CEO's meme got clipped, so why keep getting hit?
1163014 days agoby cozycat392353
Mom, send me some kimchi.
582314 days agoby perkygoat215271
Vietnam: "Please Share Korea's Semiconductor Technology"
1471814 days agoby sunnywolf124774
Do you think knowing where Gyeongsan and Jeolla provinces are is basic common sense?
131914 days agoby cheerybunny759767
Turns Out Sergeant Im's Acting Wasn't Convincing at All...jpg
921914 days agoby bubblygoat162719
Kim Soo Hyun's Current Status
1443014 days agoby breezyquail332258
How Gaseoyeon's Kim Se-ui Reacted When Kim Sae-ron's AI Manipulation Was Exposed
771615 days agoby sparklypuppy958839
11 comments
I thought just having more rebar doesn't necessarily mean it's stronger... But if rebar is so good, why not just shove in one solid 50-ton steel plate? That'd be the strongest, right? Steel is definitely tougher at the same thickness, but... anyway, from what I know, the important thing isn't the rebar itself—it's the concrete. Rebar's job is just to hold the concrete together and keep its shape. Like little sticks supporting a grape vine.
Yeah, but they removed half those sticks lol and while more isn't always stronger, the design is calculated based on what you use. If you're missing 50% from the design, that's already not normal lmao
No I don't know either, dude~ My field is nuclear engineering and concrete/rebar stuff I've only learned from flipping through FSARs by accident. So since you actually know, explain it to me
It's not that I know a lot—it's that the absolute nonsense Seoul is spouting is so dumb even someone like me who knows nothing gets it. What company plans their whole structure and then goes "hey, nobody can see this part so we can skip it" and announces it's fine? Nothing wrong with that? And it's a 5-level underground subway so the structural integrity is even more critical? Now even the Ministry of Land, the top dogs in construction, are like "stop spewing nonsense"
It's scary because if they're cutting corners on rebar, there's no way everything else is fine
So why are you running your mouth about danger without knowing how dangerous it actually is? lmao? If you can't explain and just repeat obvious middle school level stuff, shut up dude~
So what do you know that you were talking about? Explain why removing 50% rebar isn't dangerous? You're stupid talking nonsense without knowing anything yourself lmao
I never said it wasn't dangerous, you idiot? lmao I'm just curious~ Like, Seoul probably has some engineering-based reason for saying that right~ But it's annoying when people who don't even know anything come in spouting the same obvious stuff a high schooler would say like it's some big deal, you know?
If it was sound engineering, the Ministry wouldn't be bitching about it lmao. Wa-O apartments, Sampoong, Seongsu Bridge collapsed because they were sound right? lmao? Underground subways are designed to handle vibrations and everything, but you're saying that removing rebar is fine? Are you the one removing it? lmao
Oh the Ministry of Land said this~ the Ministry of Land said that~ the Ministry of Land didn't say that~ No I don't care about this crap, you idiot, just shut up. I don't even know if the Ministry of Land is your daddy or god or whatever, I don't care about that—
If removing 50% is safe then why didn't you design it with 50% less from the start, you idiot? You should've designed it with 50% less from the start and then gotten safety approval and proceeded like that, you moron
Yeah the Ministry of Land says it's safe so die then lmao. I'm not curious about that stuff, I'm just curious what these guys are saying and what it actually means~ ㅉㅉ Thickheads lol
Rebar isn't just for shape—it's for tensile reinforcement. Concrete is strong in compression but tensile strength is laughably low, so rebar does the heavy lifting there. If pillars are missing tons of rebar, compression might be fine but tensile resistance to bending moments and buckling would be way reduced. Saying it's equally safe is suspicious—if that were true why design for 2x in the first place? lmao
But if it's a pillar, doesn't only compression act on it anyway? So buckling becomes an issue? But concrete isn't a ductile material so how does buckling happen?
Buckling happens regardless of material properties if the structure is long and thin.
Like, does it actually bend? No wait, I don't need to ask this. If there's buckling and it's not ductile, it'll just shatter trying to stay rigid. But adding rebar doesn't make concrete ductile, right? So it's purely just adding structural stiffness?
You should die if Seoul says it's safe lmao. When have politicians and bureaucrats ever not made excuses and spouted nonsense? If 50% of the rebar is missing, we should check if the concrete and sand actually went in right too, and they're spewing nonsense properly lol
You've never thought about earthquakes? Even the slightest lateral force makes tensile strength more important than compression
Your mom ^^
Oh yeah, seismic design would definitely be a problem
Earthquakes are just a small part of it. Vibrations from vehicles have the biggest impact. It's not just vertical vibration. Unreinforced concrete has a really low threshold for collapse under lateral force, so to speak
Yeah with that much weight, even just the subway passing through and twisting things around has a big impact. Thanks for explaining
You know what's really scary? They say they're reinforcing with steel plates, but even if you reinforce with steel plates forever, a steel-reinforced concrete structure won't have the same tensile strength
If you think about it, steel plates don't bond well because tension/deformation isn't isotropic... But if they're driving in steel columns, I dunno. But then they would've just installed temporary supports, so there must be a reason they didn't
Vibrations from subways and vehicles generate both compression and tension.
Most of the load a building bears is supported by the concrete's compression—that's right. Concrete handles most of the compressive strength. But concrete's tensile strength is extremely low by nature, so rebar is added to compensate. The safety against vertical loads from upper structures and ground loads is mostly fine even with missing rebar. But safety against lateral loads like earthquakes, vibrations, earth pressure, and groundwater movement becomes weaker by however much rebar is missing. And one of the biggest factors affecting structural stability is the weight of the structure itself. That's why you can't just expand the structure with steel arbitrarily.
"Even someone like me who doesn't know gets it" lmao the Ministry already got reports last year and is busy passing the blame. Why would you trust what the Ministry says
Safety written in fatigue
Used to have something there but deleted it I guess
Forgot
WAIT this is actually terrifying lmaooo are they saying Korean buildings have been overbuilt this whole time??? 😭
Oh so safety margin means you can cut 50% of the rebar and still be safe... Is there also a safety margin for when they dump 2x the water into the cement?
Whoa just tell me it's all BS
No wait, even trucks passing by are designed so 1-ton trucks can carry 1.5 tons, so 1-ton capacity is safe right?
Safety protocols are written in blood. This time a storm's coming
This is either the most Korean thing ever or a massive red flag and I genuinely can't tell which 💀
Let a few thousand die then they'll make some special law lmao F
pretty sure this violates like 50 building codes but go off i guess lol
Is the acting Seoul mayor something?
Probably the vice mayor is a civil service exam grad
as someone who lives in seoul this is NOT the content i wanted to see today thanks
So you're saying the original design was overkill just to squeeze more material costs? lmao. These guys really let anyone be in society. Tell that guy to drive with half his tire pressure from now on
okay but if Seoul's been fine with half the rebar, why have the rest of us been doing it the hard way
bro the emoji at the end makes this sound so casual for what sounds like a structural engineering nightmare
The sarcasm is KILLING me but also... are apartments about to start crumbling??? asking for a friend