Cheongju Women's Prison 5-person photoshoot...Secondary victimization controversy...jpg
μλ³Έ (Korean)
Translation + Context
FT = ForbiddenTome β tap to see Korean slang explained
Yonhapnews
Yonhapnews Cheongju Women's Prison "5-Person Gang" Photo Series? ... 'A Criminal Meme' Secondary Victimization Controversy Reporter Cho Hyun-young Edited 2026.05.02. 8:10 AM ~ Article Summary) The public is trivializing brutal criminals and consuming crime as entertainment... Views reaching millions Police: "No clear punishment regulations".. Experts: "Legal legislation discussion urgent"
AI-generated images spreading under the name 'Cheongju Women's Prison 5-Person Gang' [Online community screenshot. Resale and DB prohibited] The photos show in order from 1-5: Jung Yoo-jung who killed and abandoned Lee Eun-hae and a peer woman she met through a tutoring app, Ko Yu-jung who stabbed her ex-husband with a weapon, murdered him, and abandoned his corpse, Kim So-young who killed two men with drugged beverages, and Eom In-sook from the 'Eom Yeoin Incident' who killed her husband and lover with drugs then disguised it as an accident to claim insurance money, staring straight ahead. Wanna go to the valley?
Wanna grab some curry?
Wanna have a drink? Examples of 'memes' made using publicly identified female violent criminals [Online community screenshot. Resale and DB prohibited] The problem is that while the public consumes this as interesting content, actual crime victims are exposed to serious 'secondary victimization'. Follow South Korea human rights is for protecting perpetrators and criminals. Reply 6
Β
Β
Β
Good people are busy following the law
Bad people are busy keeping the law busy
Absolute Legend Stone Age Mindsetγ γ γ γ γ γ
122112 months agoby brightowl508639
The Only Cure for Schizophrenia That Humanity Knows About
101212 months agoby bubblyseal228771
Lisenne's wedding venue storyγ γ γ
50112 months agoby snappycrane509511
Corporate Instagram Admins These Days
150142 months agoby jollywolf838585
A Female Streamer Falsely Accused of Sexual Assault
105252 months agoby goldenpanda590494
What a Top High School Hagwon Instructor Thinks About Gender Equality
111162 months agoby brightquail948846
I Finally Became a Twin Dad aaaaaah
150122 months agoby perkyfox693854
BREAKING: Army's First Official Statement on Reserve Soldier Death β "Unrelated to Heat Wave"
70122 months agoby sweetcrane791459
Actor Kim Soo-hyun the commerce god Eun-hyun receiving flowers from female fans lol
124232 months agoby livelynewt921090
Ministry of Land: So Seoul, you're saying we can use half the rebar from now on? ^^
87452 months agoby cozyfox801555
Why Dogs Wear Spiked Collars
128182 months agoby bubblypanda107636
Forget Starbucks, the Food Trend That's Blowing Up Right Now for real
101152 months agoby luckysloth848174
A 990-Point English Textbook Example.jpg
68202 months agoby jollybunny169807
A Store That Wanted a 30% Refund Fee
106112 months agoby snappyduck855211
A Photo Revealing the Severity of Climate Change
76172 months agoby snappypanda737297
Fired from Burger King After 24 Years Over 50 Cents
87202 months agoby luckypuppy897717
The missav site got blocked
10042 months agoby gigglygoat560404
YouTuber Who Attended Reserve Training When Death Occurred Reveals Shocking Scene
14792 months agoby fluffygecko465423
Seunghee, close the door quick
107172 months agoby brightquail948846
MBC's Past 5.18 Mocking Controversy
73162 months agoby perkycrane527104
6 comments
Look at these damn paparazzi using such clever wording? They're ridiculing criminals but calling it "making heinous criminals a joke," "consuming crimes as entertainment" and writing articles about it. And then they say mocking these assholes is secondary victimization of victims? Who's defending them? Do people just write articles based on whatever nonsense they ramble about on Twitter these days? Or has it been like this for a while now?
Holy shit lmaooooo
This is why we can't have nice things... women prisoners do a photoshoot and suddenly it's problematic? Make it make sense
Talking like this makes you look like you're not swept up by emotions and you're an enlightened person, right? Hehehehe
Reading the article, turns out they're talking about regulations and legislation lol...I get that they might delete mocking posts if victims or families request it, but talking about punishment provisions too? It seems like they're discussing using state power to crack down on all of this. In the end, it's just an extension of censorship and regulation violating freedom. How are we supposed to accept this? If the government gets involved in everything that's morally controversial, the right to think independently and act freely disappears. Blindly accepting it is just stupid
Fancy way of saying just let people mess around with memes, right? The thing is, on platforms like YouTube these past 2 days, there's AI footage of notorious criminals like serial killers Yoo Young-chul and Kang Ho-soon, as well as O Won-chun and Jung Yoo-jeong, in prison clothes eating or walking around the prison being spread indiscriminately with titles like "Prison Update" and "Prison Food." Right now this whole situation is just being used to farm YouTube views
ok but the secondary victimization part is actually serious, we should probably read more before commenting lol
South Korea really out here finding new ways to debate everything I swear π
Even if you drink soda and eat curry and go freediving at a valley, you'll still be alive lol
nah this is giving performative activism, like let them have ONE thing without making it about victimization
Wait, a prison photoshoot? That's actually wild, I'm confused what the controversy is about though π